CREATORVET · WHAT IT ANSWERS
Six questions.
One box.
every answer comes from public data — never from what a creator tells us about themselves
THE QUESTIONS THIS PAGE ANSWERS
We’re about to sign this creator — is this person legit?
Paste the channel. Subscriber history, engagement quality and sponsor record come back in seconds.
Run the check →
These numbers look too good to be real.
Bought subscribers, drip-fed engagement and dead audiences, flagged with the dates they happened on.
See the fraud signals →
A creator we’re paying just posted something off-brand.
Every creator you are paying is checked every night, so the flag reaches you before the screenshot does.
See monitoring →
The CMO asked what the creator line item actually delivered.
Each sponsored video measured against a matched control — what it did, against what it would have done anyway.
See lift →
We need to screen 500 creators and we have two people.
Upload the list. Every channel scored on the same rules, in one pass, with the reasons attached.
Screen a list →
Procurement wants a check that isn’t the platform grading its own homework.
Public data only, an independent seat, and a written reason behind every verdict.
See the method →
WHAT RUNS UNDERNEATH
- 01Is the audience realHow the subscribers arrived, whether the likes and comments match the views, and the dates any sudden jump actually happened on.
- 02What they’ve publishedA scan of everything the channel has actually posted, judged to the industry’s GARM brand-safety standard.
- 03Watched every dayEvery creator you are paying, checked nightly — so a problem reaches you before a screenshot does.
- 04Every sponsored videoEach sponsored video read daily, on its own, from the day it goes up.
- 05A whole list at onceEvery channel on your list judged by the same rules in one pass, with a written reason on each.
- 06What the money addedWhat a sponsored video really delivered, next to what similar creators you did not book did over the same dates.
METHOD
Nobody grades their own homework.
Google owns YouTube and sells agencies the tools that score it. Advertisers use IAS and DoubleVerify rather than the ad platform’s own report card for exactly that reason. CreatorVet is the same independent check for creators: public data only, a written reason behind every verdict, and a real measurement of what a video added — not a screenshot.
public YouTube data · refreshed daily · no creator self-reports
What we don’t do — on purpose
Only YouTube.A video keeps delivering for two years. It is the platform worth measuring properly, so it is the only one we do.
No marketplace, no cut.We earn nothing when a deal closes. That is exactly why our number on a creator can be trusted.
What happened — never a forecast.Every figure is a measurement with a date on it. Predictions are somebody else’s product.
We say what we cannot see.Where the data stops, the report says so. We cannot confirm a country for about 4 channels in 10 — and we tell you which ones.
the whole method is written down at /features
STILL ASKING
One paste.
Full report.
Full report.
the report renders in about 10 seconds — no login, and nobody calls you
screening a whole list? /bulk